<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress has passed its law. Now let them enforce it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chezlark.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chezlark.com/?p=478</link>
	<description>Semi-Coherent Rantings of a Progressive Secular Humanist</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bogle</title>
		<link>http://www.chezlark.com/?p=478#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chezlark.com/?p=478#comment-359</guid>
		<description>I heard this story on NPR and was dismayed.  

I was listening to Alito today talking about how the constitution is resilient because it intentionally leaves certain things underspecified-- like what an "unreasonable search" means.

It's true that an overly specified constitution would be brittle.  But the flexible approach assumes a certain amount of good faith, especially from the executive branch, not to abuse the flexibility, especially in secret.  That abuse is exactly what's happening now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard this story on NPR and was dismayed.  </p>
<p>I was listening to Alito today talking about how the constitution is resilient because it intentionally leaves certain things underspecified&#8211; like what an &#8220;unreasonable search&#8221; means.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that an overly specified constitution would be brittle.  But the flexible approach assumes a certain amount of good faith, especially from the executive branch, not to abuse the flexibility, especially in secret.  That abuse is exactly what&#8217;s happening now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.chezlark.com/?p=478#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chezlark.com/?p=478#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Not in &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; name, he hasn't. 

Go north, young man!

Hee hee.

Seriously, though: isn't it becoming more and more tempting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not in <i>my</i> name, he hasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Go north, young man!</p>
<p>Hee hee.</p>
<p>Seriously, though: isn&#8217;t it becoming more and more tempting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.254 seconds -->
